In Union Budget 2018-19, the expectations for healthcare unions include advanced technology, health programmes, investment and public-private partnership. Along with it, diagnostics is an industry that has become a major break point in the healthcare industry. Hence, there are other healthcare issues that should be addressed even though it has relief from the blood test errors or missed results of the laboratories.
Fig: Lab me test Results vs Molecular Testing
Due to the absence of proper regulation and lack of directives in the diagnostics market, different individual private players play a vital role in this uncertain market.
The private players have volunteered eagerly to bring standardized practice and go through the same conventions set by global medical bodies to guarantee the best and steady services for all customers.
According to estimates, only 1% of all diagnostic labs are accredited. With effect from a diagnostics point of view, one has supported the requirement for a regulated, standardized diagnostics industry and admired the government's efforts in this direction.
As a result, the government needs to assign allocations every year to have an autonomous body to control the quality of services. Better primary healthcare centres are very important to help reduce the burden on tertiary and secondary healthcare clinics.
It seems the government and regulatory bodies are focusing more on the investment in preventive and primitive measures on healthcare. By investing more in diagnostics, the healthcare industry can spread early diagnosis of a disease, reducing delay in treatment, loss of productivity, and need for tertiary care.
The private healthcare system is very effective in dealing with the patient burden of public healthcare. It has helped a lot of health insurance plans.
However, the fact is that complete and proper coverage for a lot of diseases and services is elusive. Invasive and curative interventions, like inpatient care and surgeries, are covered by public health insurance.
The lack of coverage for pre-existing diseases and outpatient care is a hurdle to affordable and complete health insurance coverage. Hence, the growing emergence of investment in diagnostics is leading to the growth of lab report management systems in many healthcare institutions.
A lot of research has been done on test result management over the years in outpatient settings. Many researchers have conducted case studies. The report includes why, where, how many, under what conditions, and what kinds of lab test results are missing. We are aanalyzingwhat could happen due to delays or missing test results.
These authors focused on the current methods to deal with blood test errors and ensured the satisfaction of clinical personnel with such methods. In addition, they also asked physicians to suggest the right solution to a problem.
Prior research reports a lot of details regarding the growing importance and problems of timely results of tests in primary care. Hence, one might expect electronic blood test result management tools to be widely available to support medical staff in the clinical process. According to studies, different institutes have different ways of handling test results.
So, there is no specific way. Further research could bring more benefits to the design of test result evaluation and management of the use of them laboratory software.
Fig: Lab Test Results with the Right Lab. me Software
There are three ideas on how this Software can help reduce missed laboratory results. There is a growing need for a system which allows clinical staff to keep track of lab tests from an order of reports to action completion.
We aim to define the temporal responsibilities of the agent with an innovative workflow management model, provide retrospective analyses which can detect common issues in past orders, and generate an interface based on that model (something which could be integrated with existing EHR systems).
Researchers have conducted many case studies to report analysis on how the healthcare providers who ordered the lab results of patients were missed.
Nobody knows that how often are blood tests wrong. With the growing need and reasons for a second blood test for timely test results in an outpatient setting, there are limited electronic versions of discussion on test result management systems to help medical and clinical staff with this process.
There could be various causes of laboratory error. Three ideas can help reduce analytical errors in the clinical laboratory with a tracking system to facilitate from order to completion along with follow-up –
According to findings by the 2002's National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey findings, general internists and family doctors prescribe lab tests in 29% to 38% of cases on average and imaging in 10% to 12% of cases. In an internal medical practice, a doctor reviews an average of 930 haematology/chemistry tests and 60 radiology/pathology reports every week.
These tests are conducted for diagnostic or screening purposes or to monitor and manage medications and chronic health issues. Even though a couple of tests are performed in the office when patients wait, many patients are sent to outer locations for their samples, including hospitals or typical testing facilities. One can avail the results during an office visit or take weeks to get the report without a similar format.
Different types and numbers of tests, other testing locations, and variable reporting processes would cause blood test errors and delays.
According to the survey, for around 83% of primary care doctors in a study, at least one delay has been found when reviewing test reports over the last two months. Poor results management can be harmful to the patients, and it did so.
Hickner and his colleagues conducted a study which suggests the adverse effects of post-analytical errors in a clinical laboratory. It includes 22% of loss of money and time, 24% delay in care, 11% in pain and suffering, and 2% in adverse clinical consequences.
Another report suggests an improper follow-up to be one of the rapidly growing areas of litigation of malpractice in outpatient care. As a result, it impacts the effectiveness and efficiency of patient safety, treatment, and overall peace of mind.
Lack of effort is not the cause of many physicians and institutions losing test results. Time is spent managing and searching the blood test errors and reports.
Testing becomes prone to error due to a separation of the Lab from the clinic's location, the process's complexity, the lack of quality control in the outpatient setting, and variations in reporting.
According to Wahls & Cram, there are no standards to manage test results at their best. Yackel et al. aanalyzedthe existing information systems used to track. They found that there were logic and user interface blood test errors in doctor's records, resulting in routing, system maintenance and setting interfaces.
Studies are also revealing what features laboratory information management system software should have. It is one of the best-rated features of medical laboratory reporting software.
Doctors must acknowledge all results with the in-box function in pathology report software. Abnormal reports should be shown before normal ones, and the integrated review prompts should help a doctor decide on further action.
These are some of the most desired functions in pprioritizinglab results to avoid medical laboratory errors and provide the best output in less time.
Doctors also recommend tracking their orders for completion, including a warning system to figure out whether a test order is complete or not. Finally, the delegation of responsibility is required by the physicians to other staff.
They desire the capability of forwarding to use surrogates during planned absences and a regular process to assign proxies when unavailable.
The concept of Lab me analysis is appreciated well and found helpful to quantify common problems instantly. It is expected experts to figure out the precision of results.
Many domain experts are interested in getting more useful information and data to track and aanalyze. Having quality attributes on the model was an interesting proposal to calculate some metrics to analyze later.
Paper charts and other traditional methods are still used by clinical staff to review their lab results. Many reports suggest general-purpose alternatives, including checklists or logbooks instead of the application. For tracking tests, Lab. me Analytics is the most advanced lab reporting software app. The app aims to analyze blood test errors and work reports for patients.
We aim to reduce the missing lab results in the analytical phase of laboratory testing by establishing a workflow model. This model defines responsibility in the management of test results.
This Software can improve the delay in computations. If a test is late, it is a matter of discussion. One could admit that it just needs to report that the test was conducted late. In events when all of the steps are taken early to cover, the delay of a facility/individual would overlook.
Should physicians propose only a standard definition or user options to be provided to examine lateness?
According to the Institute of Medicine, over $750 billion was spent in a single year on unnecessary healthcare solutions. Unwanted medical tests are a major part of the expense. They cost around $1.7 million in an American hospital in 2009.
The huge volume of results and orders through medical lab software can make it an important place to avoid waste and identify it.
For example, it can flag old tests and highlight tests which were not good for the condition. When a recent survey indicates that unnecessary testing is a huge problem, overuse is the most pressing matter.
However, uunderutilizationis even more important for safety and patient care when unwanted tests can increase the healthcare system's cost. A missing test could also cost thousands of dollars daily if an inpatient stays in the hospital.
Ref
